READ ACTS 16:1-5
Describe Timothy. *
ACTS 16:1-2
1 TIMOTHY 4:12
2 TIMOTHY 3:15
In light of the Jerusalem Council why does it seem strange that Paul would circumcise Timothy? Why did he do it?
READ ACTS 16:6-10
What possible reasons might have existed for the Holy Spirit to keep Paul, Silas, and Timothy from preaching the word in the province of Asia or Bithynia?
How did God redirect Paul? To Where?
READ ACTS 16:11-15
Describe the conversion of Lydia.
READ ACTS 16:16-40
What was the real reason Paul and Silas were taken before the authorities? How were they charged?
How were Paul and Silas punished?
A number of amazing twists occurred in the prison in Philippi. In your opinion, what is the most striking part of this account?
Hebrews 10:32-33 describes two different kinds of roles in the face of suffering. What are they?
Describe Timothy.
Timothy was a unique choice:
Timothy was a unique choice because of his youthfulness. Paul’s words in 2 Timothy 3:15 demonstrate that in spite of his youth, Timothy was fertile soil from which ministry grew: “from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus". I believe Paul saw Timothy’s tremendous potential for fruit bearing. The opportunity to train Timothy while he was still young and teachable was a benefit to Paul’s ministry, not a hindrance.
Timothy had a unique upbringing:
Timothy grew up in a home with one believing and one unbelieving parent. In those days, having a Jewish mother who had accepted Christ and a Greek father who didn’t believe would have been both different and difficult. In spite of this circumstance, God prevailed and bore wonderful fruit from an unequally yoke couple.
Timothy had a unique perspective:
Timothy had been exposed to three practices he and Paul would encounter:
1. Agnosticism because of his father’s unbelief,
2. Judaism because of his mother’s heritage, and
3. Christianity because of his mother’s acceptance of Christ as Savior.
Timothy had a unique maturity:
In our society, we’ve almost become convinced that bad influences are stronger than good. Timothy certainly is evidence to the contrary. We have a wonderful biblical precedent proving that godly influence can carry a much heavier weight than ungodly influence. 2 Timothy 1:15 described his spiritual heritage. Louis and Eunice lived their faith, and Timothy learned from their devoted, genuine examples of faithfulness.
Reference: To Live is Christ
Timothy was a unique choice because of his youthfulness. Paul’s words in 2 Timothy 3:15 demonstrate that in spite of his youth, Timothy was fertile soil from which ministry grew: “from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus". I believe Paul saw Timothy’s tremendous potential for fruit bearing. The opportunity to train Timothy while he was still young and teachable was a benefit to Paul’s ministry, not a hindrance.
Timothy had a unique upbringing:
Timothy grew up in a home with one believing and one unbelieving parent. In those days, having a Jewish mother who had accepted Christ and a Greek father who didn’t believe would have been both different and difficult. In spite of this circumstance, God prevailed and bore wonderful fruit from an unequally yoke couple.
Timothy had a unique perspective:
Timothy had been exposed to three practices he and Paul would encounter:
1. Agnosticism because of his father’s unbelief,
2. Judaism because of his mother’s heritage, and
3. Christianity because of his mother’s acceptance of Christ as Savior.
Timothy had a unique maturity:
In our society, we’ve almost become convinced that bad influences are stronger than good. Timothy certainly is evidence to the contrary. We have a wonderful biblical precedent proving that godly influence can carry a much heavier weight than ungodly influence. 2 Timothy 1:15 described his spiritual heritage. Louis and Eunice lived their faith, and Timothy learned from their devoted, genuine examples of faithfulness.
Reference: To Live is Christ
Class 6 Questions: Acts 15:1-39
READ ACTS 15:1-35
What issue was debated between believers in this chapter?
What was the background of the believers who were insistent on Gentile circumcision (v. 5)?
Each of the following people participated in the Jerusalem Council. Please not each of their contribution/arguments in the debate:
Peter:
Barnabas and Paul:
James, Jesus’ brother:
The Jerusalem Council drafted a letter to the church in Antioch and appointed two leaders, Judas and Silas, to accompany Paul and Barnabas in their return. What four things did the council ask believers to avoid?
In your own words explain what said in vv. 11-12.
What are some lessons to be learned from the Jerusalem Council?
READ ACTS 15:36-41
ACTS 15:36 tells us Paul wanted to return to the towns where he and Barnabas had preached, to see the new believers. What do you think Paul might have wanted to know about the new converts?
Based on what you know about the character Barnabas, why do you think he insisted on taking John Mark on the journey? What other reason does Colossians 4:10 give for Barnabas support?
In your opinion, was Paul being too hard on John Mark and why?
What negative repercussion resulted from the disagreement? Any positive repercussions?
What are some lessons to be learned from this disagreement? *
What issue was debated between believers in this chapter?
What was the background of the believers who were insistent on Gentile circumcision (v. 5)?
Each of the following people participated in the Jerusalem Council. Please not each of their contribution/arguments in the debate:
Peter:
Barnabas and Paul:
James, Jesus’ brother:
The Jerusalem Council drafted a letter to the church in Antioch and appointed two leaders, Judas and Silas, to accompany Paul and Barnabas in their return. What four things did the council ask believers to avoid?
In your own words explain what said in vv. 11-12.
What are some lessons to be learned from the Jerusalem Council?
READ ACTS 15:36-41
ACTS 15:36 tells us Paul wanted to return to the towns where he and Barnabas had preached, to see the new believers. What do you think Paul might have wanted to know about the new converts?
Based on what you know about the character Barnabas, why do you think he insisted on taking John Mark on the journey? What other reason does Colossians 4:10 give for Barnabas support?
In your opinion, was Paul being too hard on John Mark and why?
What negative repercussion resulted from the disagreement? Any positive repercussions?
What are some lessons to be learned from this disagreement? *
What are some lessons to be learned from the disagreement between Paul and Barnabas? *
Here are some observations about strong disagreements drawn from this passage:
1. There was one issue but more than one point of view.
In this particular argument there was an issue at stake. It was objective and clearly stated. Firm principles surrounded the issue. The viewpoints, on the other hand, were more subjective because they involve personalities. Think about a disagreement you might have had with your wife (or husband). Usually the difference is found not in the issue itself but the differing perspectives. Charles Swindoll defines a disagreement as “a conflict that involves an issue seen from opposing points of view.”
2. Both sides had validity
Just because an issue has two sides, doesn’t mean that one side is right and the other is wrong. Disagreements are more often gray than black and white. Both sides have strengths. Sure, every argument has its weakness, but both sides have strengths. Both Paul and Barnabas dug their heals because they believed so strongly in the validity of their point of view.
3. When the disagreement got heated, someone got hurt.
The more intense the heat, the deeper the wounds. Regardless of the level of maturity you have reached in your walk with Christ, you are not immune to hurt. How does that old school rhyme go? “Sticks and stones…” Names hurt, and personal character attacks often raise their ugly head in heated debate. The result is the inflicting of a wound that’s slow to heal; sometimes, regrettably, it never heals.
I throw out those three observations, not because they’re original or insightful, but because I believe they are worth remembering.
1. There was one issue but more than one point of view.
In this particular argument there was an issue at stake. It was objective and clearly stated. Firm principles surrounded the issue. The viewpoints, on the other hand, were more subjective because they involve personalities. Think about a disagreement you might have had with your wife (or husband). Usually the difference is found not in the issue itself but the differing perspectives. Charles Swindoll defines a disagreement as “a conflict that involves an issue seen from opposing points of view.”
2. Both sides had validity
Just because an issue has two sides, doesn’t mean that one side is right and the other is wrong. Disagreements are more often gray than black and white. Both sides have strengths. Sure, every argument has its weakness, but both sides have strengths. Both Paul and Barnabas dug their heals because they believed so strongly in the validity of their point of view.
3. When the disagreement got heated, someone got hurt.
The more intense the heat, the deeper the wounds. Regardless of the level of maturity you have reached in your walk with Christ, you are not immune to hurt. How does that old school rhyme go? “Sticks and stones…” Names hurt, and personal character attacks often raise their ugly head in heated debate. The result is the inflicting of a wound that’s slow to heal; sometimes, regrettably, it never heals.
I throw out those three observations, not because they’re original or insightful, but because I believe they are worth remembering.
Class 5 Questions: First Missionary Journey, Part 2
READ ACTS 14:1-7 *
How did some of the Jews and Gentiles temporarily overcome their aversion to one another for a common cause?
How did God confirm the message of His grace?
How did Paul and Barnabas respond when they found out about the plans to mistreat and stone them?
After their experiences in Iconium, what did Paul and Barnabas do when they reached Lystra and Derbe?
READ ACTS 14:8-20 *
Why were bulls and wreaths brought to the city gates in Lystra?
Why did Paul and Barnabas tear their clothes in verse 14?
Imagine you are Barnabas, watching Paul being stoned. What kinds of things might be going on in your mind?
READ ACTS 14:21-28 *
Why do you think Paul and Barnabas returned to Lystra, Iconium, and Pisidian Antioch on their way back to Syrian Antioch?
Paul and Barnabas appointed elders in each church before they departed for Pamphylia. What evidences can you find to support the seriousness of these appointments?
Paul and Barnabas had suffered and survived many things. They had also performed miracles. How did they resist any self-praise according to verse 27?
Based on Acts 13-14 what was Paul’s pattern of ministry? *
How did some of the Jews and Gentiles temporarily overcome their aversion to one another for a common cause?
How did God confirm the message of His grace?
How did Paul and Barnabas respond when they found out about the plans to mistreat and stone them?
After their experiences in Iconium, what did Paul and Barnabas do when they reached Lystra and Derbe?
READ ACTS 14:8-20 *
Why were bulls and wreaths brought to the city gates in Lystra?
Why did Paul and Barnabas tear their clothes in verse 14?
Imagine you are Barnabas, watching Paul being stoned. What kinds of things might be going on in your mind?
READ ACTS 14:21-28 *
Why do you think Paul and Barnabas returned to Lystra, Iconium, and Pisidian Antioch on their way back to Syrian Antioch?
Paul and Barnabas appointed elders in each church before they departed for Pamphylia. What evidences can you find to support the seriousness of these appointments?
Paul and Barnabas had suffered and survived many things. They had also performed miracles. How did they resist any self-praise according to verse 27?
Based on Acts 13-14 what was Paul’s pattern of ministry? *
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)